RESUMO
En el mes de Diciembre (2019) se diagnosticó la infección viral que tuvo una rápida expansión. En el mes de Junio (2020) solo en 188 países fueron diagnosticados 35 millones de pacientes. Desgraciadamente en nuestro país los resultados de la atención a los enfermos (diagnostico, aislamiento, atención), fue peor que en otros muchos (Alemania, Italia, Corea, Taiwán, Grecia, Portugal, Francia, Japón y otros). 778 pacientes trasplantados sufrieron la infección, de ellos, 249 en la Comunidad de Madrid. La donación de órganos se redujo rápidamente debido a que las áreas de hospitalización, UCI, quirófanos, actividad hospitalaria en general hubo de dedicarse al tratamiento de los enfermos infectados. Hubo de asumir la reducción de trasplantes de riñón, hígado, corazón, pulmón, en casi el 90% de las cifras correspondientes a los dos años anteriores (en el mes de abril 0%), en el periodo marzo-Julio 2020. No se permitió el trasplante con donante vivo,” Split” o "Cluster”. Solo en la Comunidad de Madrid se realizaron 37 trasplantes menos en 2020 que en 2019. Los motivos de este descenso fue la reducción de camas en UCI, de posibilidades de utilización de quirófanos, menor número de facultativos, enfermeras, personal sanitario en general (861.112 infectados, de los cuales 36.000 eran sanitarios, con una mortalidad global de 36.000). Nuevos protocolos, formas de tratamiento, vacunación, hicieron posible volver a la cifra de trasplantes realizados entre 2018-2019.Alternate : On 31 December 2019 COVID-19 Viral infection was diagnoses. On june 2020 only in 188 countries 33 millons of infected people were detected. Unfortunately in Spain the results of the treatment has been worse than in Germany, Italy, Corea, Taiwan., Grece, Portugal, France, Japan, and others. 778 transplanted patients were infected. 249 of them in Madrid area. Organ donation was reduced. National Organization of Organ Trasplantation diminished donation, and transplantation of kidney, liver, heart, lung close to 90% (in april, 0%) from march to july 2020. Living rolated or split, and cluster trasplantation was not permited. In Madrid area, on 2020 were done 37 transplantation less than in 2019 the causes of that were the reduction of UCI beds, time in the OR, reduction of doctors and nurses. 861.112 infected people, 32.992 died and from the total number of patients, 36.000 were included as, doctors, nurses and other related with health care areas new protocols, hospitals, intensive care areas, etc were established along 2020 going back to the previous results obtained during 2018-2019.
RESUMO
Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) related infection is associated with high morbidity and mortality. It has also been linked to CVC-associated bacteremia, catheter dysfunctions, as well as handling and hygienic measures taken during that time. Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare the bacteremia rate between 2019 and 2020, the last one during which the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic started. The study was accomplished in a hemodialysis unit at the Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid hospital. Material and Method: An observational retrospective cross-sectional study has been carried out in which data related to the management and functioning of the catheter were compared to the bacteremia rate linked to the catheter between 2019 and 2020 through the unit's database. Results: In 2019, thirty-five patients were included, who had a bacteraemia rate of 1.42/1,000 catheter days, and twenty-nine patients in 2020, with a bacteraemia rate of 1.82/1,000 catheter days, finding no significant differences (p=0.54), as well as not finding an increased or decreased bacteremia risk during the first year of the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Conclusions: As the main conclusion of this case of study, we are able to confirm that there is no evidence of the coronavirus pandemic and the measures adopted against the SARS-CoV-2 virus (both organizational and preventives), being a risk or protection factor in regard to the bacteraemia rate, most likely due to the low number of events found. © 2023, Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Nefrologica. All rights reserved.
RESUMO
Antecedentes: La ecografía torácica es una técnica novedosa para estratificar el riesgo de los pacientes COVID-19. Sin embargo, no existen datos que comparen dicha técnica con la radiografía de tórax, una técnica ampliamente utilizada en esta enfermedad. Pacientes y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo en pacientes estables COVID-19. Se compararon la escala de daño pulmonar radiológica de Schalekamp y ecográfica de LUZ-Score. El objetivo primario fue la muerte intra-hospitalaria o la necesidad de ingreso en UCI para tratamiento con ventilación mecánica. Resultados: Se reclutaron 138 pacientes. La mediana de la escala de Schalekamp fue de 2 (2) y la del LUZ-score de 21 (10). No se objetivó una correlación significativa entre ambas escalas. Los pacientes con un LUZ-score ≥ 21 puntos al ingreso, presentaron peor función pulmonar y mayores concentraciones de LDH, PCR e interleuquina-6. La escala radiológica de Schalekamp no logró identificar a una población de mayor riesgo. Únicamente la adición de la ecografía pulmonar a un modelo de valoración clínica, mejoró de manera significativa el área bajo la curva para el objetivo primario (ABC 0,805 [0,662 – 0,948];p=< 0,001). Conclusiones: No se objetivó una correlación entre la afectación radiológica y ecográfica. Únicamente la ecografía pulmonar identificó un subgrupo de pacientes con una mayor afectación clínico-analítica. La ecografía pulmonar mejoró el modelo de predicción clínico, mientras que la radiografía de tórax no añadió información relevante.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Co-circulation of the two Influenza B lineages hinders forecast of strain to include in trivalent vaccine. Autonomous Communities such as Cantabria continue without supplying tetravalent vaccine. The aim of this study was to analyse epidemiological characteristics of influenza type B in Cantabria (2019-2020 season) as well as to establish the predominant lineage and its relation to the recommended vaccine. METHODS: Retrospective study whereby flu diagnosis and lineage analysis were determined by RT-PCR. RESULTS: All samples belonged to the Victoria lineage. Most prevalent viral co-infection was due to SARS-CoV-2. The population affected by influenza B was mainly paediatric and non-vaccinated patients more frequently required hospital admittance. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza type B has a higher incidence in the paediatric population and type A affects more the adult population. Only 28.8% of patients with Influenza B that presented with some underlying condition or risk factor were vaccinated. This shows the need to increase coverage with tetravalent vaccines in order to reduce the burden of disease associated with the Influenza B virus.